User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 ( Nokia6600s/2.0 (p) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6600s Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.122 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 413close desktop-browsercloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia6600ssmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 6600close Nokia6600scloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 413NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6600scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series40 Nokia6600 slidemobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia6600 slideFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.059 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:40 | by ThaDafinser