User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_4_11; xx) AppleWebKit/533.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.1 Safari/533.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 4.1Mac OS X 10.4Webkit 533.16desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 4.1WebKit MacOSX 10.4AppleMacintoshDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 4.1closeOS X 10.4.11desktop-browsercloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 4.1WebKit Mac 10.4desktop0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.1closeOS X 10.4.11closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.1closeMac OS X 10.4.11closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4.1closeOS X 10.4.11closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 4.1WebKit 533.16Mac OS X 10.4.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.426 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 4.1Webkit 533.16Mac OS X 10.4desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 4.0closeMac OS X 10.4.11Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:39 | by ThaDafinser