User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (; CUS:PEAQ; MB70; 1.0; 1.0;) LOH; Opera; CE-HTML/1.0 NetFront/4.1 NETRANGEMMH
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PEAQMB70 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 4.1NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera CEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 4.1close GenericSmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 4.1NetFront PEAQDigit ISIO Stv0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close PEAQMB70closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose1.266 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.548 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 4.1 PEAQMB70televisioncloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:39 | by ThaDafinser