User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 LG-GM750h Browser/IE8.12 MMS/LGMMSv1.0/1.2 Java/LGVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 8.12; MSIEMobile 6.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGM750h Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 8.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows LGGM750Hmobile-browseryescloseclose0.2 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 8.12Trident Windows CE LGGM750hsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE LGGM750hcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile Windows LGLGGM750hcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.432 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.5LGLayla GM750mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile LGGM750HFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:39 | by ThaDafinser