User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Nokia5233) AppleWebkit(like Gecko) Safari/530,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia5233 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.067 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 530closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 Nokia5228mobile-browseryescloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia5233smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 530,gzicloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 5233close Nokia5233closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5233closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit Series60 Nokia5228mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:38 | by ThaDafinser