User agent detail

LG-CU720/V1.0l Obigo/Q05A Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Obigo Q 5A LGCU720mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 5.0 JAVA LGCU720Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-CU720 V1.0lcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM LGCU720mobile-browseryescloseclose0.201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q05A LGCU720smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close LGCU720closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q05A Browser Q05A LGLGCU720closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A LGCU720mobile:featureyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose LGCU720Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:38 | by ThaDafinser