User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-US; Spice Mi-502n Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.2.3.324 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SpiceMi502n Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U3 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.2.3.324closeAndroid 4.2.2SpiceMi 502nmobile-browseryescloseclose0.267 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2WebKit Android 4.2SpiceMi-502nsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.3closeAndroid 4.2.2SpiceMi502ncloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.3.324WebKit 534.31Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Webkit 534.31Android 4.2.2SpiceMi-502 Smart Flo Pace2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.045 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:38 | by ThaDafinser