User agent detail

HTC7088_TD/1.0 Android/4.1 release/2013 Browser/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 AppleWebKit/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Android 4.1Android 4.1unknown HTCDesire 7088Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.1WebKit Android 4.1HTCDesire 7088Mobile Phoneyesyes0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.1HTC7088mobile-browseryescloseclose0.296 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1HTC7088smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.1HTC7088_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 534.30Android HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1HTC7088mobile:smartyescloseclose0.13501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:38 | by ThaDafinser