User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPod touch; CPU iPhone OS 7_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.40 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/11A4400f Safari/8536.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AppleiPod Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes0.112 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPod Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.213 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 6.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeiPhone OS 7.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 6.0WebKit 537.40iOS 7.0AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 537.40iOS 7.0AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:37 | by ThaDafinser