User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux armv6l) AppleWebKit/535.4+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/535.4+ Debian/sid/experimental (3.2.1-2) Epiphany/3.2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
GNOME Web 3.2.1Debian Webkit 535.4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Epiphany 3.2WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Epiphany 3.2.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Epiphany 3.2WebKit Debian desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 3.2.1closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Epiphany 3.2.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Epiphany 3.2.1WebKit 535.4Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.421 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
GNOME Web 3.2.1Webkit 535.4Debian desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:37 | by ThaDafinser