User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/9.0.597.98 Safari/534.13 ChromePlus/1.6.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
ChromePlus 1.6.0.0Windows 7WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 9.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.084 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 9.0.597.98closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 9.0.597.98closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.205 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ChromePlus 1.6WebKit Windows 7desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 9.0.597.98closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 9.0.597closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ChromePlus 1.6.0.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 9.0.597.98WebKit 534.13Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ChromePlus 1.6.0Webkit 534.13Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 9.0.597.98closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 9.1.0.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:36 | by ThaDafinser