User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; ZTE V987 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.122 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 35.0Android 4.2unknown ZTEGrand X QuadMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2ZTEGrand X QuadMobile Phoneyesyes0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916.122closeAndroid 4.2.1ZTEV987mobile-browseryescloseclose0.388 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.2ZTEV987smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.2.1ZTEV987closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.122WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.2.1ZTEV987mobile:smartyescloseclose0.043 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.2ZTEV987Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:36 | by ThaDafinser