User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux sh4; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (;;;;;); CE-HTML; TechniSat Digit ISIO S; xx) Presto/2.9.167 Version/11.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Opera Devices 3.1 Presto 2.9.167TechniSatDigit ISIO Stelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.50closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.50Presto GNU/Linux TechniSatDigit ISIO Stv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux TechniSatDigit ISIO Scloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9.167Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.1Presto 2.9.167 TechniSatDigit ISIO Stelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:36 | by ThaDafinser