User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; OpenBSD i386) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Opera 12.16OpenBSD Presto 2.12.388desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.16closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.16Presto OpenBSD desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.16closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.16closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.16closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.127 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12.388OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12.388OpenBSD desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:35 | by ThaDafinser