User agent detail

Nokia6303iclassic/5.0 (06.61) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series40.yaml
Series40 Webkit 420Nokia6303i classicmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Browser JAVA Nokia6303i classicMobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420close desktop-browsercloseclose0.21 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia6303iclassicsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia6303iclassiccloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.132 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6303iclassiccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.433 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420Series40 Nokia6303i classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia6303i classicFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:35 | by ThaDafinser