User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia300/07.65; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/2.0.1.62.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Nokia Proxy Browser 2.0SymbianOS unknownunknown Nokia300Mobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Proxy Browser 2.0Gecko SymbianOS Nokia300Mobile Phoneyes0.114 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 2.0Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia300smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 07.65;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 2.0.1closeNokia Series 40 Nokia300closeclosecloseclose0.022 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 2.0.1.62.6Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 300closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.418 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 2.0.1Gecko Series40 NokiaAsha 300mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 4.0closeNokia Series 40 NokiaAsha 300Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:34 | by ThaDafinser