User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110504 Namoroka/3.6.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox Namoroka (3.6.13)Windows 7Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.07 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (Namoroka) 3.6.13closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Namoroka (3.6Gecko Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox (Namoroka) 3.6.13closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Namoroka 3.6.13closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.283 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.2.13Gecko 20110504Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Namoroka 3.6.13Gecko 1.9.2Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:33 | by ThaDafinser