User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-Z560-Vodafone/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.3 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.0 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-Z560-Vodafone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.3NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-Z560-Vodafone 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.3closeJVM SamsungSGH Z560mobile-browseryescloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.3NetFront SamsungSGH-Z560smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.3close SamsungSGH-Z560-Vodafonecloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.3 SamsungSGH-Z560mobile:featureyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.3close SamsungSGH Z560Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:33 | by ThaDafinser