User agent detail

Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320) BlackBerry7280/4.0.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
BlackBerry7280 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
BlackBerry 4.0 WinCE RIMBlackBerry 7280Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 3.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
BlackBerry Browser closeRIM OS RIMBlackBerry 7280mobile-browseryescloseclose0.214 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 3.02Trident Windows CE RIMBlackBerry 7280smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 3.02closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
BlackBerry 7280closeWindows CE BlackBerry7280closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 3.02closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.115 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Blackberry Browser 4.0.0 BlackBerry OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 3.0.2 BlackBerry OS 4.0RIM240mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 3.02closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile RIMBlackBerry 7280Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:31 | by ThaDafinser