User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) MxBrowser/%s Chrome/30.0.1551.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Maxthon 0.0WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.126 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1551.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 30.0.1551.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink Windows XPdesktop0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1551.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1551closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 30.0.1551.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1551.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon Blink Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1551.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.071 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:31 | by ThaDafinser