User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; InfoPath.2; SlimBrowser/7.00.061)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-other.yaml
SlimBrowser 7.00.061Windows XPTrident 4.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 8.0Trident 4.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SlimBrowser closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.462 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows XPdesktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 8.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SlimBrowser 7.00.061closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SlimBrowser 7.0.61Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SlimBrowser 7.00.061Trident 4.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 8(Compatibility View)closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:31 | by ThaDafinser