User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; ) Opera, SAMSUNG-SGH-I637/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/4.0 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-I637 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 4.0Trident SamsungSGH-I637smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 4.0close SamsungSGH-I637closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 4.0 Windows Mobile Samsungi637 Jackmobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:30 | by ThaDafinser