User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Unknown; UNIX BSD/SYSV system) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) QupZilla/1.7.0 Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-788.php
QupZilla 1.7Unix unknownunknown unknowngeneral DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QupZilla 1.7WebKit Unix Desktop0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QupZilla 1.7.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.238 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QupZilla 1.7.0closeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeUnix closecloseclosecloseclose0.139 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QupZilla 1.7.0WebKit 534.34 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QupZilla 1.7.0Webkit 534.34Unix desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:30 | by ThaDafinser