User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; xx; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080829 SeaMonkey/1.1.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 1.1.12OS X Gecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 1.1.12closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 1.1.12closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.1.12closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 1.1.12closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 1.1.12Gecko 20080829Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.423 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 1.1.12Gecko 1.8.1OS X desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:30 | by ThaDafinser