User agent detail

SIE-CX6V/00 UP.Browser/7.0.0.1.121 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SiemensCX6V Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 Mobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SIE-CX6V closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.0.1.121close SiemensCX65mobile-browseryescloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 SiemensCX6Vsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.0.0close SiemensCX6Vcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.0.1.121 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.0 SiemensCX6mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SiemensCX65Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:30 | by ThaDafinser