User agent detail

[FBAN/FB4A;FBAV/3.9;FBBV/666395;FBDM/{density=1.5,width=540,height=960};FBLC/en_US;FBCR/3 AT;FBPN/com.facebook.katana;FBDV/HTC Desire 601;FBSV/4.2.2;FBOP/18;FBCA/armeabi-v7a:armeabi;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesire 601 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Facebook close HTCDesire 601mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 3.9 HTCDesire 601smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 3.9close HTCDesire 601closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTC Desirecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook HTCDesire 601mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:29 | by ThaDafinser