User agent detail

MOT-V501/0B.09.38R MIB/2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaV501 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-V501 0B.09.38Rcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2close MotorolaV501mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaV501smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaV501closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola V501closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaV501mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaV501Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:29 | by ThaDafinser