User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U) AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/22.0.1229.79 Safari/537.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-084.php
Chrome 22.0Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 22.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 22.0.1229.79closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 22.0.1229.79closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.23302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 22.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 22.0.1229.79closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 22.0.1229closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 22.0.1229.79closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.39404 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 22.0.1229.79WebKit 537.4Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.61406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 22Webkit 537.4Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 22.0.1229.79closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 22.0.1229.79closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:29 | by ThaDafinser