User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT; Avant Browser; Avant Browser; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-184.php
Avant 0.0WinNT unknownunknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Avant Trident WinNT Windows DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Avant Browser closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.23902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Avant Browser Windows NTdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Avant 1closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Avant Browser closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Avant Browser Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Avant Browser Windows desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.076 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:28 | by ThaDafinser