User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MJ12bot/v1.4.4; http://www.majestic12.co.uk/bot.php?+)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-279.php
yesMJ12botBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesMJ12botBot/Crawler0.07 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesMJ12bot/v1.4.4close0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesMJ12 BotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesMJ12botclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
PHP 1.4.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.11101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Majestic-12 Distributed Search Bot closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:28 | by ThaDafinser