User agent detail

SonyEricssonU5at/R2BA; Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; U; Series60/5.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Safari/525
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonU5at Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.0NetFront SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4SonyEricssonU5amobile-browseryescloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0Sony EricssonVivazfeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4SonyEricssonU5atcloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia BrowsercloseSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 525Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson U5atcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 525Series60 5.0Sony EricssonU5atmobile:smartyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonU5aFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:28 | by ThaDafinser