User agent detail

Nokia208.1/2.0 (04.06) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series40.yaml
Series40 Nokia208mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia208 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 Nokia208mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia208smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia208closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 208closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series40 Nokia208mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia208.1Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:27 | by ThaDafinser