User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows Phone 8.1; ARM; Trident/7.0; Touch; rv:11;IEMobile/11.0; NOKIA; Lumia 928) like Gecko
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
IEMobile 11.0WinPhone8.1 8.17.0 NokiaLumia 928Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 11.0Trident 7.0WinPhone8.1 8.1NokiaLumia 928Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:11closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 11.0Trident Windows Phone 8.1NokiaLumia 928smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows Phone 8.1closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 11.0closeWindows Phone 8.1NokiaLumia 928closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 11closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.10401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Phone NokiaLumia 928closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Trident 7.0Windows Phone 8.1NokiaLumia 928mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 11.0closeWindows Phone 8.1NokiaLumia 928Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:27 | by ThaDafinser