User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 3GS; CPU iPhone OS 6_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 MQQBrowser/5.0.4 Mobile/10B146 Safari/8536.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-ios.yaml
QQ Browser 5.0iOS 6.1.2Webkit 536.26AppleiPhone 3GSmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.059 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.1.2AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.0WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhone 3GSsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.0.4closeiOS 6.1.2closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeiPhone OS 6.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.13301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.0.4WebKit 536.26iOS 6.1.2AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.0Webkit 536.26iOS 6.1.2AppleiPhone 3GSmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:27 | by ThaDafinser