User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534+ (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
Apple Mail 0.0Win8 6.2unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Apple Mail WebKit Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Apple Mail closeWindows 6.2email-clientcloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 8desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:26 | by ThaDafinser