User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; MI 3W Build/KVT49L) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.69 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Chrome 40.0Android 4.4unknown XiaomiMI 3WMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.4XiaomiMI 3WMobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.69closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214.69closeAndroid 4.4.2XiaomiMI 3Wmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 40.0Blink Android 4.4XiaomiMI 3Wsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.69closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214closeAndroid 4.4.2XiaoMiMI 3Wcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.69WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40Blink Android 4.4.2XiaomiMi 3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.69closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 40closeAndroid 4.4XiaomiMI 3WSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.067 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:25 | by ThaDafinser