User agent detail

4G Explorer/3.5.3 (Linux;Android 4.2.2,HM NOTE 1TD) AppleWebKit/533.1 (863990024967042,78)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
4G Explorer 3.5.3Android 4.2.2Webkit 533.1XiaomiRedmi Note 1mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
4G Explorer 3.5.3closeAndroid 4.2.2XiaomiRedmi Note 1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 533.1Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
4G Explorer 3.5.3Webkit 533.1Android 4.2.2XiaomiRedmi Note 1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.042 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:25 | by ThaDafinser