User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; ARM; Trident/6.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows RT Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 10.0Trident 6.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 10.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident Windows RT yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 10.0closeWindows RT closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.11701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows RTdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 10(Compatibility View)closeWindows 8MicrosoftTabletyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:25 | by ThaDafinser