User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Yeti/1.1; +http://help.naver.com/robots/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
yesNaverBotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesNaverBotBot/Crawler0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesNaver Yeticlose0.20302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesYeti/NaverbotSearch bot0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesYeticlose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesYetiCrawler0.21102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesNaver Yeticlose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesNaver Yeticlose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:24 | by ThaDafinser