User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AppleiPod Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit iOS 4.3AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes0.067 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 5.0.2closeiOS 4.3.2AppleiPod Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 5.0WebKit iOS 4.3AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0.2closeiOS 4.3.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 5.0.2closeiOS 4.3.2AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0.2closeiPhone OS 4.3.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 5.0.2WebKit 533.17.9iOS 4.3.2AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 533.17.9iOS 4.3.2AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.0.2closeiOS 4.3.2AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.105 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:24 | by ThaDafinser