User agent detail

Nokia2690/2.0 (10.10) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series40.yaml
Series40 Nokia2690mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia2690 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 Nokia2690mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia2690smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia2690closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 2690closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series40 Nokia2690mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia2690Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:24 | by ThaDafinser