User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; iP890-3G Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.154 YaBrowser/14.4.1750.13427.00 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DexiP890-3G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2DEXiP890 3GTabletyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.154closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 14.4.1750.13427.00closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.36204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 14.4Blink Android 4.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 14.4.1750.13427.00closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 14.4.1750closeAndroid 4.2.2DexiP890-3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 14.4.1750.13427.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 14.4Blink Android 4.2.2iP890-3Gtabletyescloseclose0.09501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.154closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.051 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:24 | by ThaDafinser