User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Android; COS2.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.63 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-cos.yaml
Chrome 31COS Blink 537.36mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeAndroid desktop-browsercloseclose0.20402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Android tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.63WebKit 537.36Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink COS mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit closeLinux Tabletyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:23 | by ThaDafinser