User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.4.4; en-US; SM-G530H) U2/1.0.0 UC Browser/8.8.0.332 U2/1.0.0 EH('�D
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
UC Browser 8.8Android 4.4unknown SamsungGalaxy Grand Prime DualMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.8U2 Android 4.4SamsungGalaxy Grand Prime DualMobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux SamsungSM-G9008Vmobile-browseryescloseclose0.31603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.8 Android 4.4SamsungSM-G530Hsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.8.0closeAndroid 4.4.4closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.24702 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.8.0.332 Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.59906 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.8Gecko Android 4.4.4SamsungGalaxy Grand Primemobile:smartyescloseclose0.033 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:23 | by ThaDafinser