User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Nintendo WiiU) AppleWebKit/536.28 (KHTML, like Gecko) NX/3.0.3.12.6 NintendoBrowser/2.0.0.9362.EU
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/nintendo.yaml
NetFront NX 3.0 Webkit 536.28NintendoWii Ugaming:console Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront NX 3.0WebKit NintendoWiiUConsoleyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NintendoBrowser 2.0.0.9362.EUcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nintendo Browser 2.0.0.9362.closeNintendo desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront WebKit Nintendo WiiNintendoWiiUconsoleyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront NX 3.0.3close NintendoWii Ucloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netfront Browser NX 2.0.0.9362.EUNetFront 536.28 NintendoNintendo WiiUcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront NX 3.0Webkit 536.28 NintendoWii Ugaming:consolecloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Nintendo Wii U closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close NintendoWii USmart-TVcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:22 | by ThaDafinser