User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; XELIO10EXTREME Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Safari/537.36 OPR/18.0.1290.67495
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
OdysXELIO10EXTREME Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 18.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 18.0.1290.67495closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 18.0.1290.67495closeAndroid 4.2.2Xelio10 Extrememobile-browseryescloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 18.0Blink Android 4.2yes0.019 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 18.0.1290.67495closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 18.0.1290closeAndroid 4.2.2OdysXELIO10EXTREMEcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 18.0.1290.67495WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 18.0Blink Android 4.2.2OdysXelio 10 Extremetabletyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 18.0.1290.67495closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 18closeAndroid 4.2Xelio10 ExtremeTabletyesyescloseclose0.075 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:22 | by ThaDafinser