User agent detail

avast/1.0.7118 (7118;de_DE) ID/b33d64d4dc8c5179 HW/HTC One S Android/4.1.1 (JRO03C)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCOne S Android Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
avast 1.0.7118closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1HTCOne Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.25502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1HTCOne Ssmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.1.1HTCOne S Androidcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTC One Scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.1.1HTCOne Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.117 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:22 | by ThaDafinser