User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 2.3.3; PMP7074B3GRU Build/GRI40) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.123 Safari/537.22 OPR/14.0.1025.52315
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PrestigioPMP7074B3GRU Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 14.0Blink Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.129 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 14.0.1025.52315closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 14.0.1025.52315closeAndroid 2.3.3GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 14.0Presto Android 2.3PrestigioPMP7074B3GRUtabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 14.0.1025.52315closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 14.0.1025closeAndroid 2.3.3PrestigioPMP7074B3GRUcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 14.0.1025.52315WebKit 537.22Android 2.3.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 14.0Webkit 537.22Android 2.3.3PrestigioMultipad 7074tabletyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 14.0.1025.52315closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 14closeAndroid 2.3Tabletyesyescloseclose0.064 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:21 | by ThaDafinser