User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; XT1034 Build/KXB20.9-1.8-1.4) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.92 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaXT1034 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.057 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599.92closeAndroid 4.4.2MotorolaXT1034mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 30.0Blink Android 4.4MotorolaMoto Gsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.4.2MotorolaXT1034closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.92WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.38204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Android 4.4.2MotorolaMoto Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 34closeAndroid 4.4MotorolaXT1034Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.054 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:21 | by ThaDafinser