User agent detail

Samsung/910XXIG2/sw_platform=S60;sw_platform_version=5.0;java_build_version=1.3.4 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsung910XXIG2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.108 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Samsung 910XXIG2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 Samsung910XXIG2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java Symbian OS Series 60 Samsung910XXIG2smartphoneyes0.016 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeSymbian OS Samsung910XXIG2closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.20602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 Samsung910XXIG2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungSGH i560Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.052 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:21 | by ThaDafinser